skip to Main Content
Fighting For Australian Workers Who Have Had Their Wages Stolen By Their Boss
‘Justice For Drivers’ – Uber Drivers Are Employees UK Court Rules

‘Justice for Drivers’ – Uber drivers are employees UK court rules

Uber drivers are employees, and not independent contractors, the UK’s Supreme Court has ruled.

The ride-share company will have to pay thousands of Uber drivers the minimum wage and holiday pay as a result of the landmark decision.

The UK decision will be studied closely by Australian unions and industrial advocates who have long argued gig economy workers are employees and not contractors.

Uber drivers are employees and not contractors

The UK court decision follows a long-running battle between Uber and two drivers James Farrer and Yaseen Aslam.

The pair took Uber to an employment tribunal in 2016, arguing they worked for Uber, and not engaged as independent contactors.

However, the company argued it engaged the drivers as self-employed contractors, therefore it’s not responsible for paying minimum wages or holiday pay.

The employment tribunal ruled in favour of the drivers.

Appeals

Uber appealed the decision to the Employment Appeals Tribunal which subsequently upheld the original decision in November 2017.

Then the company took the case to the Court of Appeal, which also upheld the ruling in December 2018.

Finally, Uber appealed to the Supreme Court, which upheld the original decision too.

In his judgement, Lord Leggatt said that the court unanimously dismissed Uber’s appeal that it is an intermediary party.

Furthermore, he said Uber drivers work while driving a passenger, and also whenever logged on to the app.

The court considered the following in its decision:

  • Uber set the fare which meant that they dictated how much drivers could earn
  • Uber set the contract terms and drivers had no say in them
  • Request for rides is constrained by Uber which penalises drivers who reject too many rides
  • Uber monitors a driver’s service through the star rating and has the capacity to terminate the relationship if after repeated warnings this does not improve

Looking at these and other factors, the court determined that drivers are in a position of subordination to Uber.Furthermore, it found the only way drivers can increase their earnings is to work longer hours.

Australian gig economy workers

Industrial relations expert Miles Heffernan from IR Claims says the UK court ruling might have implications for Australian gig economy workers.

“Currently there is an argument about whether Aussie gig economy workers are workers or contractors,” he said.

“In one case, the Fair Work Commission ruled in favour of a Foodora worker who claimed unfair dismissal.

“But in another case, the Commission ruled that an Uber Eats driver was an independent contactor.

“The government needs to impose regulations on the gig economy to give certainty and to ensure workers aren’t exploited.”

Uber promises more consultation

In response to the UK Supreme Court decision, Jamie Heywood, Uber’s Regional General Manager for Northern and Eastern Europe, said:

“We respect the Court’s decision which focussed on a small number of drivers who used the Uber app in 2016.

“Since then we have made some significant changes to our business, guided by drivers every step of the way.

“These include giving even more control over how they earn and providing new protections like free insurance in case of sickness or injury.

“We are committed to doing more and will now consult with every active driver across the UK to understand the changes they want to see.”

NOW WATCH:

To contact our team at WAGETHEFT.net.au, please call

1300 184 338

To connect with us, please follow us on

 

Back To Top