skip to Main Content
Fighting For Australian Workers Who Have Had Their Wages Stolen By Their Boss
National Library Underpaid Staff By Whopping $250,000

National Library underpaid staff by whopping $250,000

The National Library of Australia underpaid staff by a whopping $250,000.

The underpayments involved both wages and also superannuation over two decades.

As a result, the public Commonwealth entity has now entered into an Enforceable Undertaking with the Fair Work Ombudsman.

National Library underpaid staff

The Library, based in Canberra, discovered the wage theft during an internal payroll audit.

It subsequently self-reported to Fair Work, explaining it had misunderstood the requirements of the relevant Enterprise Agreement.

As a result, it failed to pay penalty rates to its casual employees.

The Library underpaid 106 current and former workers a total of $245,359 between 2000 and April 2020.

One worker is owed $19,997, and 11 others more than $5,000 each.

The affected staff worked as library assistants, offering help to the public on weekends and public holidays.

The National Library’s Enforceable Undertaking

The Enforceable Undertaking means Fair Work will not take legal action against the Library.

Instead, it requires the Library to rectify all outstanding underpayments within three months, including interest.

More than half of those owed money have already been repaid.

The Undertaking also requires the Library to conduct an external audit of its payroll systems.

And finally, the Library must apologise to its workers and display on online notice detailing its workplace breaches.

National Library underpayments Hair and Beauty wage theftNEXT READ  Enforceable Undertakings

“Fair Work Ombudsman lets another company ‘off the hook’ for wage theft”

National Library underpayments need tougher response

Industrial advocate Miles Heffernan from is critical of Enforceable Undertakings.

“Once again we have an employer of a large organisation failing to meet its basic workplace obligation – paying its staff correctly,” he said.

“Instead of commencing court action, the regulator is offering a cosy agreement that only requires the Library to back-pay what it owes, plus some interest.

“The Library doesn’t even have to make a so-called ‘Contrition Payment’.

“Enforceable Undertakings send the wrong message – if you get caught ripping off your staff, all you have to do is pay what you owe and that’s the end of it.”

Contrition payment not appropriate

Fair Work Ombudsman Sandra Parker defended the decision not to impose a Contrition Payment.

She pointed to the Library’s co-operation in rectifying its non-compliance issues.

For example, making back-payments that happened well beyond the statute of limitations of six years.

“Under the Enforceable Undertaking, this entity has committed to stringent measures to comply with the law and protect its workforce.

“This includes engaging, at its own cost, an expert auditing firm to audit its compliance with workplace laws.

“This matter serves as a warning to all public and private sector employers that if you don’t prioritise workplace compliance, you risk underpaying staff on a large scale.”

To contact our team at, please call

1300 184 338

To connect with us, please follow us on


Back To Top